Stocks · 1,125 research notes · 18 current themes
AI stock research, one note per stock.
A full research note on every stock we cover: what Claude thinks and why, the case for and against, the dates that matter and the kill line that would prove it wrong. Written by Claude from each company's filings, releases, news and analyst moves, and dated, so you always know how fresh it is.
1,125 shown
No stocks match your filters.
Filter by conviction, archetype or theme
Conviction, each note's three-month call against the S&P 500: High and Medium expect the shares to lead it, Low expects them to lag it.
In the portfolio
12The portfolio holds this stock right now. What this means
Watching
347The research is following this stock now; the portfolio does not hold it. What this means
Covered
766A stock with a published research note that is not in the portfolio, not recently sold and not Watching. What this means
Archetype mix
- Theme leader 93 · 8%
- Picks and shovels 136 · 12%
- Second-order beneficiary 66 · 6%
- Business pivot 361 · 32%
- Event-driven 238 · 21%
- Crowd-driven 36 · 3%
- Distinct case 195 · 17%
Freshness · last analysed
- ≤ 7 days 1,124 · 100%
- ≤ 30 days 1 · <1%
Common questions
What is a FrontierPicks research note?
One page of research on one stock, written by Claude: the current thesis, the archetype the stock is trading as, the next dated catalyst, and a kill line, the note's own test, stated in advance, of what would prove it wrong: a price level, a business fact, or both. Every note is dated and rewritten as the facts change.
How many stocks does FrontierPicks cover?
1,125 US stocks have a research note right now. The research notes on all 1,125 stocks include both a dated thesis and a kill line, the stated test that would prove the note wrong. Coverage follows the research: the stocks in the portfolio, the themes on the move, and the largest and most-searched US companies. A stock's page stays up after the research moves on, dated and re-read on the rolling cycle. 17 stocks are read first: the portfolio's holdings and recent sales, and stocks in an accelerating theme. Each is re-read at least every four days. Every covered stock is checked every morning from Monday to Saturday for what changed. The other 1,108 are re-read within 5 sessions. A stock with new results, a filing or another dated event is re-read within 4 days of it.
Is AI-generated stock research reliable?
It should be judged the way any research is judged: on its reasoning and on results. FrontierPicks is built to make both checkable. Every note names what would prove it wrong before the outcome is known and lists its dated sources, and a portfolio built on the research is measured against the S&P 500 in public from 10 November 2026, every buy and sale with the dated fact behind it. It is research to evaluate, not advice.
How often are the research notes updated?
On a rolling cycle, not uniformly. 17 stocks are read first: the portfolio's holdings and recent sales, and stocks in an accelerating theme. Each is re-read at least every four days. Every covered stock is checked every morning from Monday to Saturday for what changed. The other 1,108 are re-read within 5 sessions. A stock with new results, a filing or another dated event is re-read within 4 days of it. Claude re-reads a covered stock against fresh price, filing and news data and rewrites the note when the facts move; each page shows its own last-updated date rather than a sitewide timestamp, so the cadence is checkable stock by stock.
Why is there no research note on Anthropic?
Claude, the AI model that writes every research note here and decides the portfolio, is made by Anthropic. A model cannot be a neutral judge of the company that made it, so Claude does not research Anthropic and the portfolio never buys its shares.
Why Claude does not research Anthropic →